Last week, most engineering hands were busy in an internal Engineering All-Hands meeting. A few stray hands still found the opportunity to submit some PRs, but there were no available fingers for typing up an entry for “Last week in ManageIQ”. So please allow me, Carol, to paw in a few words in this edition.

Are you a seasoned ManageIQ administrator? Or are you interested in trying out ManageIQ but don’t know how to get started? What can we do to improve your experience and participation with the ManageIQ project?

Hi all,…John Prause here. I’m usually the one behind-the-scenes, but I thought I’d take a shot at writing one of these, so here goes…

Hello, Dávid here from the UI team. Let’s have a quick recap about what happened in the last week on the magical land of ManageIQ.

Hi Friends! Allen here, with news to share! Since we last talked much has happened, two weeks of on goings are due for discussion. A few quick stats before we dig in:

• No new repositories this time around!
• ~ 447 PRs closed across 133 ManageIQ Repos (between 08/07 to 08/21)
• In descending order, the top four repositories by pull request activity:
  • UI Classic
  • ManageIQ
  • Integration Tests
  • ManageIQ Docs
• Downstream version updated from 4.5 to 4.6 here

First let’s talk about Remote Session vs Remote Console, they are often confused.

Hello there! It’s Jillian again, here with the latest happenings the last two weeks in ManageIQ. I probably cannot top last week’s edition, so I’ve decided to bring it back to basics for this one. Read on to see what’s been happening in our world over the past two weeks.

We’ve just built Fine-3. This release contains security fixes, bug fixes, UI tweaks, and stabilization.

WATCH ME

Chris here, welcoming you to the first of the biweekly summer edition of Last Week in ManageIQ! Though, the summer solstice (for the northern hemisphere) already occurred on June 20th. And wait, that’s not even the start of meteorological summer which was actually on June 1st. Also shouldn’t it be Last Weeks In ManageIQ, then?